Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (230g / 8,11oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX
