Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
