Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW
Seafishing
63.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.71 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €213.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/300
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX and Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX stands out for a weight of 425g / 14,99oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 23 Caldia SW?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
- Scoring 8.79 out of 10 (425g / 14,99oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX
