Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (300g / 10,58oz) and gear ratio (4.8:1). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Aero C5000X
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Delphin HORNET 50X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Aero C5000X