Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa BG 2500X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa BG
Spinning
75.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/190
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 2500X clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.6:1) and weight (265g / 9,35oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa BG?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Daiwa BG 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X
