Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
