Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa RX LT?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX
