Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa RX LT?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa RX LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
