Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR edges out Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (520g / 18,34oz) and the durability (8.63 out of 10). Still, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Daiwa TANASENSOR?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- A gear ratio of 4.3:1 (scoring 6.78 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
