Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €54.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/360
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X stands out for a weight of 273g / 9,63oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.18 out of 10 (273g / 9,63oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX
