Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX and Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X stands out for a weight of 300g / 10,58oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX
