Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
