Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X edges out Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (200g / 7,05oz) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX
