Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (155g / 5,47oz) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
