Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (155g / 5,47oz) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Shimano Complex XR?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
