Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX and Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.6:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Shimano Sedona FJ 500?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX
