Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX edges out Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.0:1) and the weight (215g / 7,58oz). Still, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Delphin YUPIE vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX
