Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and weight (215g / 7,58oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
