Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (260g / 9,17oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
