Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9.70oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X
