Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
57.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.51 lbs
Weight315 g - 11.1oz
Line retireve per crank88 cm / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings4 Shielded Stainless Steel
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX and Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag stands out for a gear ratio of 6.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag?
Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
