Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
58.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics4.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.5 lbs
Weight290 g - 10.3oz
Line retireve per crank82 cm / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX and Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag stands out for a weight of 290 g - 10.3oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag?
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290 g - 10.3oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX
