Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III

Spinning

74.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability7.69 out of 10

Ergonomics6.12 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs

Weight265g / 9.35oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €89.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.20/220

Daiwa BG MQ

Seafishing

59.60 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability4 out of 10

Ergonomics5.99 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight285g / 10.05oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €159.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-XH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Penn Battle III 2000X edges out Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the durability (7.69 out of 10). Still, Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch and a weight of 285g / 10,05oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa BG MQ?

Penn Battle III 2000X

A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.