Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
74.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.20/220

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
59.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.49 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight635g / 22.4oz
Line retireve per crank110 centimeter / 43.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/300
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 2000X edges out Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). Still, Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa BG MQ?
Penn Battle III 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX
