Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III

Spinning

72.80 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability7.73 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs

Weight330g / 11.64oz

Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €96.10
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180

Daiwa BG MQ

Seafishing

56.60 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.56 out of 10

Ergonomics5.79 out of 10

Gear ratio5.7:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight430g / 15.17oz

Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €169.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size6000D-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Conclusion

Penn Battle III 3000X edges out Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). Still, Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 430g / 15,17oz and a ergonomics of 5.79 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa BG MQ?

Penn Battle III 3000X

A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.