Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
72.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.73 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 3000X and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 3000X offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Penn Battle III 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X
