Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III, 3000, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, BTLIII3000, 1518032
Penn Battle III
Spinning
72.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.73 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandPENN
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €96.10
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180
Shimano AERO XR, C3000, left and right hand, Feeder fishing reel, Front Drag, AEROXRC3000
Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €114.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Both Penn Battle III 3000X and Shimano AERO XR C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 3000X offers a durability of 7.73 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C3000X stands out for a weight of 210g / 7,41oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano AERO XR?

Penn Battle III 3000X

  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.