Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 6000X and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 6000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX
