Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 6000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and line retrieve per crank (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 6000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (11,3kg / 24,91lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
