Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 6000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and durability (7.81 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 6000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (11,3kg / 24,91lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
