Penn Battle III 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 6000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.6:1) and the durability (7.81 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 545g / 19,22oz and a ergonomics of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (11,3kg / 24,91lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX
