Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
74.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.46 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight655g / 23.1oz
Line retireve per crank116 centimeter / 45.67 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/210
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 6000X and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 6000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch, while Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
