Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
70.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €435.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 6000X and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 6000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch, while Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX stands out for a weight of 425g / 14,99oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X
