Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI

Penn Battle III, 6000, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, BTLIII6000, 1518036
Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandPENN
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €113.30
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €48.10
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2000 HGS
  • Handle typeHandle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Conclusion

Both Penn Battle III 6000X and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 6000X offers a durability of 7.81 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI stands out for a weight of 215g / 7.58oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?

Penn Battle III 6000X

  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.