Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
