Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
