Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 8000 HSX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX offers a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.3 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX
