Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the weight (210g / 7,41oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
