Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 8000 HSX and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX offers a durability of 8.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- Rated 8.51 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
