Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Penn Battle III 8000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) and total score (9.11 out of 10). While Penn Battle III 8000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R
