Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
91.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €234.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Battle III 8000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and weight (210g / 7,41oz). While Penn Battle III 8000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
