Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 8000 HSX and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX offers a durability of 8.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Delphin REDIX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
