Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Penn Battle III 8000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) and weight (300g / 10,58oz). While Penn Battle III 8000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X