Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Penn Battle III 8000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Penn Battle III 8000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X
