Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (175g / 6,17oz) and the line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X
