Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and the weight (195g / 6,88oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX
