Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) and the weight (300g / 10,58oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Delphin REDIX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
