Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) and the weight (285g / 10,05oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X
Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Delphin REDIX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X