Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa Crossfire LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X
