Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
66.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.81 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €112.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 8000 HSX and Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX offers a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs, while Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa Freams LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X
